Filing deadline: April 30. Build your Martin County plan today.

High Plains Ecoregion

Wildlife Management Plan for Martin County, Texas

Martin County sits at the convergence of 3 Texas ecoregions, with 44 documented wildlife species.

Intelligence Snapshot

PricingAcreage-based. See pricing details.
EcoregionHigh Plains (spans 3 ecoregions). Ecoregion guide.
Area915 sq mi
Species44 documented (moderate)
Federal Listed1 (0 endangered, 1 threatened)
Conservationmoderate priority (1 critical habitat designations)
Min Acreage30 to 50 acres
Filing DeadlineApril 30. Deadline details.

Regulatory Complexity

The county spans 3 ecoregions. A plan written for the wrong landscape position could prescribe inappropriate intensity standards or target the wrong species assemblage. A properly calibrated plan accounts for these constraints. A generic plan does not.

Martin County Ecological Profile

Martin County's 915 square miles contain 17,325 documented oil and gas wells alongside short-grass prairie and playa lake systems, creating a landscape where industrial infrastructure and ecological management coexist at close range. Buffalo grass, blue grama, and sideoats grama once covered millions of acres, grazed by bison and pronghorn. The intersection of 3 ecoregions creates a convergence zone where species from multiple regions overlap. This ecological complexity means no single management template applies countywide.

Wildlife management on the High Plains centers on playa lake conservation, CRP grassland management, and rangeland restoration. Playa lakes are the primary recharge mechanism for the Ogallala Aquifer and the single most important wildlife habitat feature in the region. Protecting playas from sedimentation caused by tillage on surrounding cropland, maintaining native grass buffers around playa margins, and managing water levels through careful grazing are essential practices. On CRP contracts converting to wildlife management valuation, landowners should maintain the established grass cover, introduce prescribed fire or patch burning to create structural diversity, and install wildlife-friendly fencing that allows pronghorn passage. Mesquite and prickly pear encroachment on native rangeland requires periodic mechanical treatment followed by targeted herbicide application.

Transitional Ecoregion

Martin County intersects 3 distinct ecoregions: Edwards Plateau, High Plains, and Southwestern Tablelands. This is not a minor detail. A plan calibrated to the Edwards Plateau would prescribe the wrong intensity standards, the wrong target species, and the wrong management timeline for a property in the Southwestern Tablelands zone. Property-specific ecoregion classification is the first step in any credible plan.

Soil Conditions

Soils are deep, calcareous loams and clay loams of the Pullman, Sherm, and Amarillo series, formed in Ogallala Formation deposits and capable of high agricultural productivity under irrigation.

Fire Ecology

The High Plains historically burned at 5 to 10 year intervals, driven by lightning and maintained by vast, ungrazed grasslands. Prescribed fire remains valuable for managing CRP stands and preventing mesquite encroachment, though wind and low humidity require careful burn planning.

Spans 3 ecoregions: Edwards Plateau, High Plains, Southwestern Tablelands

The lesser prairie chicken, listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act, is the flagship species of the High Plains. This grouse depends on native shinnery oak and mid-grass prairie for nesting and brood-rearing, and its populations have declined sharply due to habitat conversion and fragmentation from wind energy development. Pronghorn, the fastest land mammal in North America, requires large, open landscapes with minimal fencing. Mountain plover nests on bare, disturbed ground in short-grass prairie and fallow fields. Swift fox, burrowing owl, and ferruginous hawk round out a community of grassland specialists that benefit from maintaining large, connected tracts of native rangeland.

Martin County Species of Conservation Concern

TPWD records 44 species in Martin County. Birds represent the most documented group at 23 species. 1 federally listed species and 39 Species of Greatest Conservation Need have been documented in the county.

Birds23
Mammals13
Reptiles4
Plants2
Amphibians1
Insects1

Primary Management Targets

lesser prairie-chicken, pronghorn, mule deer

Listed Species

yellow-billed cuckooCoccyzus americanus
Federally Threatened

Western distinct population segment is threatened. Requires large patches of mature riparian woodland (cottonwood, willow) with dense understory. Clearing riparian corridors wider than 300 feet may trigger consultation in designated critical habitat.

lesser prairie-chickenTympanuchus pallidicinctus
State Endangered

Depends on native shinnery oak and mid-grass prairie for nesting and brood-rearing in the western Rolling Plains and High Plains. Conversion of native rangeland, wind energy infrastructure, and fence collisions are primary threats. Wildlife-friendly fencing is recommended in occupied range.

white-faced ibisPlegadis chihi
State Threatened
Texas horned lizardPhrynosoma cornutum
State Threatened

Depends on harvester ant colonies for food. Fire ant suppression and native grassland restoration directly benefit this species. Listed as state threatened.

Source: Texas Parks & Wildlife Department RTEST Database; U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Critical Habitat Designations

High Plains Wildlife Management Standards

Management in Martin County revolves around playa lake conservation, CRP grassland structure, and wildlife fencing that allows pronghorn passage. Because the county spans 3 ecoregions, the applicable intensity standards depend on where the property sits. For the High Plains portion, TPWD requires 30 to 50 minimum acres, 10% brush management, and annual census documentation (34 TAC Section 9.2002). Primary targets are lesser prairie-chicken, pronghorn, and mule deer. Management prescriptions emphasize maintaining large, connected tracts of native rangeland with minimal fencing.

These are the intensity thresholds your plan must meet for the High Plains ecoregion. Your county appraisal district will verify compliance against these minimums. A plan that does not address them risks denial of your wildlife management valuation. For a complete overview of the seven management pillars, see the management pillars guide.

brush management10% of acreage OR 10 acres annually, whichever is less

This is a hard minimum. The appraisal district will verify that your plan prescribes brush management on at least this proportion of your acreage annually.

food plots1% of acreage, minimum 1/4 acre

Food plots must provide nutritional supplementation for target species. The minimum size and density are set by ecoregion to reflect carrying capacity.

protein feeders1 per 320 acres, minimum 16% crude protein, aflatoxin <20 ppb

Feeder placement and protein content are auditable. The aflatoxin threshold (20 ppb) is a compliance requirement, not a suggestion.

fire ant control10 acres or 10% of infested area annually

Fire ant suppression directly supports native harvester ant populations, the primary food source for Texas horned lizard and other ground-foraging species.

cowbird removalminimum 30 birds annually

Brown-headed cowbirds are brood parasites that reduce nesting success of songbirds. The minimum applies to properties where cowbird trapping is selected as a management activity.

prescribed burning15% of property over 7-year rotation

The burn rotation percentage applies over the full plan period. Properties that cannot burn due to WUI constraints must document the limitation and substitute equivalent mechanical treatment.

nest boxesdensity based on target species territory size

Nest box density is based on territory size of target cavity-nesting species. Boxes must be monitored and maintained annually.

Source: TPWD 34 TAC Section 9.2002, Comprehensive Wildlife Management Planning Guidelines

Water Resources

4 Groundwater Conservation Districts regulate water resources in the county, with permitting requirements for new wells and production limits that affect agricultural and wildlife management water sources.

GLASSCOCK GROUNDWATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTC
LLANO ESTACADO UNDERGROUND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTC
MESA UNDERGROUND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTC
PERMIAN BASIN UNDERGROUND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTC

Infrastructure

Martin County has substantial oil and gas infrastructure: 17,325 documented wells across 19 categories and 10,705 pipeline segments recorded by the Railroad Commission.

Environmental Considerations

1 TCEQ Voluntary Cleanup Program site has been documented in Martin County. Active remediation continues at 1 site.

915 square miles of short-grass prairie above the Ogallala Aquifer. In Martin County, playa lake conservation is the most impactful practice.

Build your Martin County wildlife management plan.

Your Martin County wildlife management plan, calibrated to High Plains ecoregion standards, covering 44 documented species. Same-day delivery.

Build Your Plan